Lilith Lilith.
← Back to comparison
LLM comparison · detail

Claude Fable 5.1

Provider: Anthropic

Model type: market frontier Budget: premium, when mistakes hurt Use it for: coding Use it for: AI agents Use it for: company knowledge

coding pick backed by current AA.

Verdict “Claude Fable 5.1 has IQ 53.4 and input $10/M in the sources. Consider it for coding, AI agents; for mass-volume, real-time-latency, run a second benchmark before rollout.”

Snapshot summary

Anthropic is the US AI company behind Claude, strongest around long context, coding workflows, agent control and safer model behavior. Claude Fable 5.1 is a premium, specialized Claude option for the hardest agentic work, long coding tasks and decisions where a mistake costs more than both tokens and waiting time. Its position relative to Opus comes from the verified numbers on the card.

In this compare snapshot it is tagged mainly for coding, agents, rag, with price tier premium and context window is unavailable in verified data. The negative side matters too: watch mass-volume, real-time-latency. Use the numbers below as the hard boundary, because this profile explains the model, it does not replace benchmark provenance.

Figures below, fetched from source artificial_analysis (fetched 2026-09-24T04:00:35Z).

Snapshot figures

$10/M input artificial_analysis:claude-fable-5-1
$50/M output artificial_analysis:claude-fable-5-1
53.4 intelligence index artificial_analysis:claude-fable-5-1

What this means

✓ Good for: coding · AI agents · company knowledge
✗ Not for: mass volume · strict latency

Source and provenance

  • Data source: artificial_analysis
  • Fetched: 2026-09-24T04:00:35Z
  • Status per metric: price: artificial_analysis:claude-fable-5-1; IQ: artificial_analysis:claude-fable-5-1; Elo: curated_seed; Aider: curated_seed; DeepSWE: curated_seed

This page shows only verified data from the current snapshot.