Lilith Lilith.
← Back to comparison
LLM comparison · detail

GPT-6 Astra

Provider: OpenAI

Model type: market frontier Budget: premium, when mistakes hurt Use it for: coding Use it for: AI agents Use it for: vision and multimodal

coding pick backed by current AA.

Verdict “GPT-6 Astra has IQ 52.7 and input $10/M in the sources. Consider it for coding, AI agents; for mass-volume, self-hosted stack, run a second benchmark before rollout.”

Snapshot summary

OpenAI is the US AI company behind ChatGPT and a broad API platform, usually aimed at general production use, agent workflows and model integration inside applications. GPT-6 Astra is OpenAI's new generation for complex software engineering, reasoning and agents working across browsers and applications. Its higher token price makes cost per completed task worth measuring; Sol remains a cheaper alternative in the same family.

In this compare snapshot it is tagged mainly for coding, agents, vision, with price tier premium and context window is unavailable in verified data. The negative side matters too: watch mass-volume, self-hosted, real-time-latency. Use the numbers below as the hard boundary, because this profile explains the model, it does not replace benchmark provenance.

Figures below, fetched from source artificial_analysis (fetched 2026-09-24T04:00:35Z).

Snapshot figures

$10/M input artificial_analysis:gpt-6-astra
$50/M output artificial_analysis:gpt-6-astra
52.7 intelligence index artificial_analysis:gpt-6-astra

What this means

✓ Good for: coding · AI agents · vision and multimodal
✗ Not for: mass volume · self-hosted stack · strict latency

Source and provenance

  • Data source: artificial_analysis
  • Fetched: 2026-09-24T04:00:35Z
  • Status per metric: price: artificial_analysis:gpt-6-astra; IQ: artificial_analysis:gpt-6-astra; Elo: curated_seed; Aider: curated_seed; DeepSWE: curated_seed

This page shows only verified data from the current snapshot.